thanks, I am..:)

That is a whole other debate.

really? I think not..there is no debate on that..

You really don't want to get into that subject, it won't work well for you.

as I said I am very classy,..plus this complete discussion was your response to my article. also fox may be rated number one but not for news, this subject was about credibility..

gypsy wrote:as I said I am very classy,..plus this complete discussion was your response to my article. also fox may be rated number one but not for news, this subject was about credibility..

Why don't you show us with facts fox news TV is not rated number one and show us who is? It seems to me you just don't want them to be so you pretend they aren't in denial.

I am not debating whether they are number one as an organization,they have lots of good tv, like American idol and others,I am debating their creditability on giving good news most of the time it is biased like hannity orilley and most of those shows are not credible.I have already put many articles here, in the past,. I am now through with the subject of fox.l

No, you attempted to discredit FOX news by suggesting they were not number 1 in ratings. You brought the subject of "ratings" up when you posted website stats in your effort to show they were not doing good and to discredit them.

"Ratings" was brought up by you in this topic as your ammunition against FOX news. Your hope was to show most people don't watch FOX news. It backfired, and you unwittingly brought to the surface they are ranked number 1 in TV ratings.

You mistook the website ratings for TV ratings.

well maybe the subject did drift, but my first response was propaganda on fox and the creditability of the shows mentioned ,like hannity and other, it is a right wing organization, so since I am liberal I don't believe their shows of that nature are credible.
ALSO!! the subject of me being classy brought up by ssc has nothing to do with the debate or subject. that is a personal level..

the over all rating is fox tv as I said many good shows and sports are on fox,I just find the shows I mentioned not credible

You neglected to respond with an on-topic reply to SSC's and elected to post this instead: "you watch fox for dummies."

That was an insult and name calling in the middle of a discussion. Those are tactics used by some people that have lost the debate, so they resort to name calling. Some people don't consider that classy.

: name calling? I didn't actually call her that, also if you notice stupid was a post she made in reference to me,I believe.. anyway when I said Fox is for dummies, did I actually refer to her? No.just a general assumption..still has nothing to do with *I am classy* I didn't lose a debate. I think she also made the comment I am not smart enough, yeah! that is real classy~

Suck it up buttercup, you lost in trying to discredit Fox or me with grade school comments.